1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 160 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK (316 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph 2000 | 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Triumph | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 2000 | SLK |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 316 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |