1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M3 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Triumph 2000 | 2010 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Triumph | BMW |
| Model | 2000 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1803 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1392 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2761 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |
