1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Escape (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Escape weights approximately 1733 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Escape (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Ford Escape | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Escape |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2903 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 132 L |