1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2010 GMC Sierra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Sierra (364 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1489 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Sierra (506 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph 2000 | 2010 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Triumph | GMC |
Model | 2000 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 364 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 506 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2659 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 129 L |