1965 Triumph Vitesse vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1965 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Triumph Vitesse | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Triumph | Peugeot |
Model | Vitesse | RCZ |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1359 mm |