1965 Vauxhall Velox vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Vauxhall Velox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Vauxhall Velox would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Vauxhall Velox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1965 Vauxhall Velox. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1965 Vauxhall Velox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 73 kg more than 1965 Vauxhall Velox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Vauxhall Velox is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Vauxhall Velox. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Vauxhall Velox | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Vauxhall | Acura |
| Model | Velox | CSX |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
