1965 Volvo 120 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Volvo 120 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Volvo | Jaguar |
Model | 120 | XJ |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 297 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 85 L |