1965 Volvo P 210 Duett vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (168 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 284 kg more than 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo P 210 Duett.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Volvo P 210 Duett | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Volvo | Mazda |
Model | P 210 Duett | 6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |