1965 Wartburg 311 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 311. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 842 kg more than 1965 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 311. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Wartburg 311 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Wartburg | Cadillac |
Model | 311 | STS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 899 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 368 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |