1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A3 (138 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Because 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2011 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Audi |
| Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
