1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (194 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Willys-Overland | Holden |
Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 194 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |