1965 Zastava 1500 vs. 2010 Ford E-150

To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (265 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 870 kg more than 1965 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-150 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500. 2010 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 1965 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1965 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: