1965 Zastava 850 K vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 725 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Zastava 850 K | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Zastava | Acura |
| Model | 850 K | CL |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 3210 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
