1965 Zastava 850 K vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 660 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Zastava 850 K | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Zastava | Nissan |
| Model | 850 K | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
