1965 Zastava 850 K vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 680 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Zastava 850 K | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
Model | 850 K | Epica |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 846 cc | 1993 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2710 mm |