1965 ZAZ 966 vs. 2010 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2010 Ford Kuga is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Kuga (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Kuga weights approximately 800 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Kuga (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Kuga will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1965 ZAZ 966 | 2010 Ford Kuga | |
Make | ZAZ | Ford |
Model | 966 | Kuga |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 887 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2700 mm |