1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1966 Abarth 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 1300 | 6C |
Year Released | 1966 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 53 L |