1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 Abarth 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1485 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 79 L |
