1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1962 Austin A 99
To start off, 1966 Abarth 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 900 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 1962 Austin A 99 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 1300 | A 99 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 34 L |