1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo (230 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo weights approximately 418 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo | |
| Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 1300 | Cuneo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 8800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1048 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2360 mm |
