1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Abarth | Oldsmobile |
Model | 1300 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2670 mm |