1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 925 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | El Camino |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2980 mm |
