1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Abarth | Caterham |
| Model | 1300 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 36 L |
