1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1986 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1986 Toyota Tercel is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Toyota Tercel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1986 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1986 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Toyota Tercel weights approximately 150 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 1986 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1300 | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2440 mm |
