1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
Model | 1300 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |