1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 298 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 557 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 435 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2570 mm |
