1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1997 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1997 Ford Taurus is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 1997 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2760 mm |