1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 1300 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2850 mm |
