1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2001 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1990 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 2001 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2960 mm |
