1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Alfa Romeo 147
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 147. (118 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 | |
Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 1300 | 147 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |