1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Abarth 1300 weights approximately 186 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Abarth | Westfield |
Model | 1300 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2320 mm |