1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1187 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | STS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 66 L |