1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1436 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2066 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 87 L |