1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |