1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2007 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (443 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 2007 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | XLR |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 443 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
