1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |