1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 335 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 1300 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |
