1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1850 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
Model | 1300 | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 88 L |