1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (382 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 700 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 4190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 100 L |