1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2009 GMC Yukon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Yukon (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1511 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 2009 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Abarth | GMC |
| Model | 1300 | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 332 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2141 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 98 L |
