1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2009 Lotus Elise is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Elise (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lotus Elise weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | 1300 | Elise |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 40 L |