1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Flex weights approximately 1398 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Flex |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |