1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1725 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1300 | Commander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5652 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 78 L |