1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Twingo
To start off, 2010 Renault Twingo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2010 Renault Twingo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Twingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Twingo weights approximately 290 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Twingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Renault Twingo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1300 | Twingo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 40 L |