1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 821 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 1966 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | C30 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |