1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2012 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Challenger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Challenger (376 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 1222 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2012 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |