1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |