1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2013 Hyundai Equus is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Hyundai Equus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Hyundai Equus (423 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Equus should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 1459 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Hyundai Equus | |
| Make | Abarth | Hyundai |
| Model | 1300 | Equus |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 423 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2089 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5158 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1889 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3045 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 77 L |
