1966 Abarth 595 vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Calais is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 595. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1520 kg more than 1966 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 595 | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 595 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 594 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 82 L |
