1966 Abarth 595 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 595. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 595.
Because 1966 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 595 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 595 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2490 mm |